1. I can recommend GlobalCache and BitwiseControls units for
affordable control. If you need more advanced control, then you can
look into the Crestron and AMX types.
But if you are just after standard IR control and the occasional
serial and relay control, you can't go past the boxes that are made
just to do this.
2. The iTach family accepts multiple connections (up to 8 I believe)
as Fiasco said. Although I think their rs232 iTach units are still
single connection only. Some iTach units also have a built in IR
learner (whereas the GC-100 units had to use an external IR learner
which took up a serial port when needed).
3. All GlobalCache units work with our software. Basically anything
that can be controlled via Ethernet will work with CommandFusion
(there are some that don't, such as HAI who require complex encryption
for all connections, other than their rebranded Bitwise box - the HTX
- which works perfectly with our software).
4. Wired is always better if you have the option. Only go wireless if
you REALLY have to.
Jarrod
On Apr 1, 1:33 pm, Fiasco <dgvoll...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Big diff between iTach and the GC-100 units is that the GC-100's can
> only have one remote using it at a time.
>
> On Mar 31, 4:17 pm, deciBel <e...@mangset.no> wrote:
>
>
>
> > Hi!
>
> > I've been working as a custom installer for 6-7 years now, and Ive
> > been working with a lot of different systems.
> > To share with you some of my experience, and opinion in a few short
> > words...I'd say that if you want to controll your "whole house" type
> > of installation; I'd recomend
> > Crestron, AMX, Elan Homesystems, ...or one of the Global Caches GC-100-
> > products,...but ...it all depends on how large your installation is
> > and what exactly you want to control... Almost any system will do.
> > (but I would try to avoid X10. Very unstable).
>
> > 2: Dont know, but Im very happy with the Global Cache - CG-100-18 Im
> > testing out @ work now.. I havent tried the iTach yet, but Im looking
> > forward to test this out too.
>
> > 3: Yeah, I guess there is no difference with this system compared to
> > any other...?
>
> > 4: Wired products are ALWAYS more stable. (ALWAYS!) Because then you
> > know that you've got a connection between point A to point B.
> > If tou still have to use WiFi...A big tip here is: If you can avoid
> > it, try not to use any accesspoints, or "more than one wifi router...
> > This will slow down the wifi signals, because the signal will spend
> > more time, to "swap" comunication between eachother, than actually
> > send the signals to where its supposed to. Ive experienced this a lot,
> > and I cant tell you how much time Ive spent trying to fix "wifi"
> > mysterious problems.... (So again: Use cables if you can! :)
>
> > ...but to conclude: ..no matter what you end up using as a
> > controller... There is NO BETTER OPTION than the CommandFusions
> > software as the choice of GUI!
> > And the key here is also: The GUI is what you will see, touch, and
> > use. The components, and your controller device, is normally hidden
> > away in a rack, in the basement or whaterver.... and they all do
> > basically the same thing. Some are better than others. The iPad will
> > be a revolution within the custom install industry. Guaranteed...! (at
> > least thats what I think! )
>
> > Hope you got some useful info here, since you asked for my opinion:)
>
> > Best Regards
>
> > Even
>
> > On 31 Mar, 21:09, ldavies <ll...@lloydus.com> wrote:
>
> > > I have a few questions:
> > > 1) Does anyone have any opinions on which hardware device is best for
> > > controlling A/V equipment in the USA?
> > > 2) Is the Global Cache iTach family of product better than their older
> > > GC-100 product?
> > > 3) Does the iTach family of products work with the Command Fusion
> > > software?
> > > 4) It is more convenient for me to us a wifi product than a wired
> > > product but will this benefit be overcome by the problems I might have
> > > with latency etc over wifi if I chose to use the iTach WiFI to IR
> > > product (WF2IR) instead of the iTach ethernet product (IP2IR)?
>
> > > Thanks much for any opinions. I am going to be testing the use of an
> > > iPad device to control an A/V installation.
>
> > > Lloyd
>
> > On 31 Mar, 21:09, ldavies <ll...@lloydus.com> wrote:
>
> > > I have a few questions:
> > > 1) Does anyone have any opinions on which hardware device is best for
> > > controlling A/V equipment in the USA?
> > > 2) Is the Global Cache iTach family of product better than their older
> > > GC-100 product?
> > > 3) Does the iTach family of products work with the Command Fusion
> > > software?
> > > 4) It is more convenient for me to us a wifi product than a wired
> > > product but will this benefit be overcome by the problems I might have
> > > with latency etc over wifi if I chose to use the iTach WiFI to IR
> > > product (WF2IR) instead of the iTach ethernet product (IP2IR)?
>
> > > Thanks much for any opinions. I am going to be testing the use of an
> > > iPad device to control an A/V installation.
>
> > > Lloyd- Hide quoted text -
>
> > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -
>
> > - Show quoted text -
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "CommandFusion" group.
To post to this group, send email to commandfusion@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to commandfusion+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/commandfusion?hl=en.
