Re: Multiple commands

Yep we thought of this too, wont be in the next release, but hopefully
the one after.

Jarrod

On Aug 1, 4:24 am, Hickup <hic...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Sounds nice, but how about some switch in the preference settings,
> with which you can influence the closure behaviour?
>
> Kind regards,
> Frank
>
> On Jul 31, 4:08 pm, Jarrod Bell <jar...@guilink.com> wrote:
>
>
>
> > Yes it will take advantage of the iOS4 multitasking.
>
> > Which means to actually close the app and reload the GUI file you will
> > need to open the task manager (double click home button) and hold the
> > app icon to close it.
> > Extra pain, but worth it for the speed in opening the app each time.
>
> > Jarrod
>
> > On Jul 31, 1:07 pm, gchts <thebo...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > > Will the new release use the new multitasking api's for ios4?  It
> > > would be great to be able to open iviewer in the state you left it
> > > using a global cache device.
>
> > > Brian
>
> > > On Jul 30, 3:43 am, Jarrod Bell <jar...@guilink.com> wrote:
>
> > > > Yes the new features will allow you to do what you want (I think!)
>
> > > > Next release will be in 2-3 weeks, will be iViewer version 3.4.0
> > > > (guiDesigner 2.3.2.0)
>
> > > > Jarrod
>
> > > > On Jul 29, 7:41 am, Hickup <hic...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > > > > Hello,
>
> > > > > the ability to cycle through actions with subsequent clicks on one
> > > > > button is exactly what I currently search for.
>
> > > > > My target is to have a 'set' button:
>
> > > > > First click on that button will display a user interface (subpages)
> > > > > for TC remote control
> > > > > Second click on same button will display a user interface for DVD
> > > > > remote control
> > > > > Third click again on the same button will display a user interface for
> > > > > Music remote control
> > > > > Fourth click... you get the picture.
>
> > > > > My original approch was to create multiple buttons each with an
> > > > > individual digital join number at exactly the same position which
> > > > > macros so that the press of a button would make itself vanish and
> > > > > display the next in line - complicated.
>
> > > > > This new feature set seems to match my requirement exactly.
>
> > > > > Now I have two questions:
> > > > > Will this new feature cover my use case?
> > > > > When will the next release arrive and what version number will it
> > > > > have?
>
> > > > > Well, the obvious answer to my second question is: "When its done" ...
>
> > > > > Kind regards,
> > > > > Frank
>
> > > > > On Jul 15, 1:41 pm, Jarrod Bell <jar...@guilink.com> wrote:
>
> > > > > > This is possible in the next release.
>
> > > > > > Here is something I posted in another thread on the google group
> > > > > > (multimode buttons thread):
>
> > > > > > The next release will allow you to do much more powerful button
> > > > > > actions:
> > > > > > 1. Send command and/or macro on press, with configurable repeat timing
> > > > > > whilst button is held.
> > > > > > 2. Send command and/or macro on release
> > > > > > 3. Send command and/or macro on press and hold, after configurable
> > > > > > delay, as well as with repeating after original hold delay time.
> > > > > > 4. Any combination of the above (multiple 'press' actions for
> > > > > > example).
> > > > > > 5. Be able to create groups of actions, when are cycled through on
> > > > > > each press. So if you had 3 action groups, press 1 would fire action
> > > > > > group 1, press 2 fire action group 2, press 3 action group 3, then
> > > > > > press 4 wouldcycleback to action group 1, and continue.
>
> > > > > > So you would create two on press actions, one to send the macro, other
> > > > > > to send the command.
>
> > > > > > Jarrod
>
> > > > > > On Jul 15, 9:35 pm, James S Davis <jamessda...@dystopiandream.co.uk>
> > > > > > wrote:
>
> > > > > > > I know if I need to send multiple commands that I can use a macro.
> > > > > > > There are many occasion where I have a long list of commands to send
> > > > > > > and then depending on which button is being pressed there is one
> > > > > > > command different.
>
> > > > > > > In one situation I can see myself having to create 64 different macros
> > > > > > > where really I need 8 macros and 8 commands.
>
> > > > > > > Would it be feasible to allow say command 1 and command 2 where.
> > > > > > > Command 1 would be sent followed by command 2 these could be either
> > > > > > > macro or a standard command as it is now.
>
> > > > > > > I also have found myself using macros to set sub-page digital joins
> > > > > > > low so to have a macro that will set all my d joins low followed by
> > > > > > > setting the one I need high would be handy.

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "CommandFusion" group.
To post to this group, send email to commandfusion@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to commandfusion+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/commandfusion?hl=en.