Re: Controlling Yamaha RX-V3900 (Noob question)

Just had an idea, going to try setting it up as a macro instead.

On Jun 6, 4:47 pm, Neil <neil.s.bar...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I'm still struggling to make the Yamaha RX-V3900 work via IP.
>
> It would appear that to get a proper status back from the Amp I need
> to send a GET after the PUT.
>
> So the workflow is:
>
> send:
> POST /YamahaRemoteControl/ctrl HTTP/1.1\x0D\x0A\x0D\x0A<YAMAHA_AV
> cmd="PUT"><Main_Zone><Power_Control><Power>Standby</Power></
> Power_Control></Main_Zone></YAMAHA_AV>
>
> rcv:
> HTTP/1.1 200 OK\x0D\x0A
> <YAMAHA_AV rsp="PUT" RC="0"><Main_Zone><Power_Control><Power></Power></
> Power_Control></Main_Zone></YAMAHA_AV>
>
> then to get the actual status of the main zone power I need to send:
> HTTP/1.1\x0D\x0A\x0D\x0A<YAMAHA_AV
> cmd="GET"><Main_Zone><Power_Control><Power>GetParam</Power></
> Power_Control></Main_Zone></YAMAHA_AV>
>
> to which the Amp would respond with:
> HTTP/1.1\x0D\x0A\x0D\x0A<YAMAHA_AV rsp="GET"
> RC="0"><Main_Zone><Power_Control><Power>Standby</Power></
> Power_Control><Main_Zone></YAMAHA_AV>
>
> So I set the Command Value for the power off button to:
> POST /YamahaRemoteControl/ctrl HTTP/1.1\x0D\x0A\x0D\x0A<YAMAHA_AV
> cmd="PUT"><Main_Zone><Power_Control><Power>Standby</Power></
> Power_Control></Main_Zone></YAMAHA_AV>POST /YamahaRemoteControl/ctrl
> HTTP/1.1\x0D\x0A\x0D\x0A<YAMAHA_AV
> cmd="GET"><Main_Zone><Power_Control><Power>GetParam</Power></
> Power_Control></Main_Zone></YAMAHA_AV>
>
> Which I was hoping would set the value and request the status.  It
> does seem to set the value but not provide the response which I could
> then use to change the state of the power button.
>
> Any help would be most appreciated.
>
> Kind regards
>
> On Jun 4, 12:54 pm, Marc-Etienne HUNEAU <mehun...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
>
> > In fact, the Crestron module (from the website) has issues. One can
> > understand why !
>
> > --
> > Marc-Etienne Huneau
> > Dark Side of the Room -www.dsr.fr
> > 06.615.516.90
>
> > Le 2 juin 2010 à 10:08, Jarrod Bell <jar...@guilink.com> a écrit :
>
> > > Wow what a terrible protocol to implement...
> > > Good luck to anyone doing this. It's very possible, but will not be a
> > > walk in the park!
>
> > > Jarrod
>
> > > On Jun 2, 5:37 pm, Fiasco <dgvoll...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >>http://webpix.ca/files/RX-V3900_Z7_ETHERNET_IF_Spec_e_1.0.xls
>
> > >> What an awful protocol.  Soooo glad I purchased an onkyo before
> > >> getting into automation.
>
> > > --
> > > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "CommandFusion" group.
> > > To post to this group, send email to commandfusion@googlegroups.com.
> > > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to commandfusion+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
> > > For more options, visit this group athttp://groups.google.com/group/commandfusion?hl=en.

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "CommandFusion" group.
To post to this group, send email to commandfusion@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to commandfusion+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/commandfusion?hl=en.