That certainly does make sense. Allen's "Four Criteria Model for
Choosing Actions in the Moment" goes like this:
1. Context
2. Time available
3. Energy available
4. Priority
If you've got a ton of tasks where the first 3 are relatively equal,
you can and should fall back on priority (before resorting to "gut
feeling"). But I do personally agree with it being the last thing on
this list. That's kinda why I don't spend too much time worrying
about it (even though most task management tools, including ToDo, put
it front and center).
Best,
Michael
On Jan 21, 2:10 pm, hockey_magnet <cju...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Absolutely - GTD is not meant to be 100% rigid, I think I interpreted
> DA's concept around next actions as being combined somehow with
> priorities . I also think it really makes a difference if you have a
> lot of single tasks or a lot of projects with a lot of tasks. In my
> case, if I have 10 projects that all have to get completed, it is
> usually easy to decide NA's. The problem becomes if all the NA's have
> the same or similar context and relative time limits, which one do I
> choose? That's why I use priorities so that I don't have to spend so
> much time re evaluating which NA to do next. Having said that
> priorities do change and the one thing I've learned from GTD is if you
> do not do the Review consistently, the system inevitably just turns
> into a to do list and simply doesn't work properly.
>
> This is all just my opinion of course
>
> Chris
>
> On Jan 21, 9:18 am, mmorowitz <mmorow...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
>
> > Thanks very much, hockey_magnet. I can certainly see your point about
> > priorities. I'm going to go back and read what Allen says about
> > priorities, especially in the context of a Next Action list.
> > Personally, I have a very hard time making a mental decision about
> > priority when I'm processing a task. I generally just say, "I don't
> > know! I just need to do it!!"
>
> > When I read GTD, priorities and projects were the two chapters/
> > concepts that I found least applicable to my personal style. My mental
> > picture of my own tasks is a big bucket of stuff that all needs to get
> > done: few goal-oriented projects and all tasks are important (with a
> > few exceptions). In spite of that minor disconnect for me, GTD really
> > works (now). I've found this to be the case with a lot of other GTDers
> > that I've talked to: there are one or two elements of the overall
> > approach that aren't effective. For some people, it's contexts, for
> > others it's the tickler file.
>
> > This is one of the things that I like about GTD: it's a clearly-
> > defined approach with just enough flexibility to allow for personal
> > style. There are, of course, a few elements that I believe are
> > critical elements (inbox processing, calendar management, task
> > reviews).
>
> > jimmydolittle, I'm very glad you found it helpful. It makes the time I
> > spent writing it up worthwhile to see that someone found it useful.
>
> > Best,
> > Michael
--
Learn more about Todo (task management made simple), Notebook (notes available everywhere), and AccuFuel (fuel efficiency tracker) on Appigo's website: http://www.appigo.com/
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "Appigo Todo" group.
To post to this group, send email to appigo-todo@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
appigo-todo-unsubscribe@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/appigo-todo?hl=en


Comments
0 comments to "[appigo-todo] Re: How I use GTD with Appigo Todo"
Post a Comment